Live@EDU | On-Premises |
| ||||
Object Count | 7675 | 7585 |
| |||
Total Time (seconds) | 4193.25 | 597.01 |
| |||
Total Time (minutes) | 69.89 | 9.95 |
| |||
Average Insertion time | 0.55 | 0.08 |
| |||
Mode | 0.41 | 0.05 |
| |||
Median | 0.44 | 0.05 |
| |||
Max | 9.29 | 3.5 |
| |||
Min | 0.10 | 0.03 |
|
So our latest tests on inserting calendar items into Live@Edu vs. inserting into on-premises Exchange gives us a 7:1 time ratio.
That is: it is currently about seven times faster to migrate calendar data into your own Exchange server than it is to migrate it to Live@Edu. We've seen the same data set go far longer, but this is a good estimate to use in your planning purposes. Also yesterday another real-world site reported a figure similar to the one we found.
Just so you know.
1 comment:
January 6, 2015: Aside from the fact that Live@EDU does not exist anymore, this post has gotten a lot of readers very suddenly. We've figured out how to dramatically speed the insertion process into Office 365.
Post a Comment